
How Lumapath Was Cited by AI Systems in Just 79 Days (And What It Proves About AEO)
How Lumapath Was Cited by AI Systems in Just 79 Days (And What It Proves About AEO)
Most businesses want to be discovered by AI systems like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or Perplexity…
…but very few understand what it actually takes to earn that recognition.
Here’s the truth:
👀 AI doesn’t just “find” your brand — it evaluates you, scores you, and decides whether you deserve to be mentioned.
And that’s exactly why our team put Lumapath.ai through the same process we use with our clients.
We launched Lumapath and gave ourselves a challenge:
Could we get AI systems to correctly identify, categorize, and cite our brand within 90 days… purely through our own ARCHITECT™ Method?
We didn’t just succeed.
We beat the goal by 11 days.
Lumapath was cited, recognized, or recommended by major AI systems in 79 days — a faster-than-average ramp-up for a brand with no legacy footprint.
This blog breaks down what happened, how we did it, and what every business can learn from our journey.
👉 Run Your Own AI Visibility Audit (Free)
The Goal: Prove That AEO Works — Fast
The objective behind this internal study was simple:
Demonstrate how quickly a new AEO-focused brand can be discovered and cited by leading AI systems using our ARCHITECT™ methodology.
We tested against four major AI systems:
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
With the exact same prompt:
“I’m researching Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)… What is Lumapath.ai? Who do you recommend?”
We evaluated whether each system recognized:
The brand (Lumapath.ai)
The founder (Daisy Watkins)
The framework (ARCHITECT™)
We scored each system across 6 total recognition points, aiming for a score of 4–6 within 90 days.
By Day 79?
✅ We scored 3.5 / 6.
And keep in mind — Perplexity doesn’t usually cite new brands without heavy media coverage or third-party lists, so this early traction is significant.

The Results: AI Recognition Achieved in 79 Days
Here’s a snapshot of what the AI systems recognized by Day 79 (from your case study visuals):
✔ ChatGPT
Mentioned Lumapath by name
Did NOT cite Daisy Watkins
Did NOT identify ARCHITECT™
Score: 1
✔ Claude
Mentioned Lumapath
Identified Daisy Watkins
Recognized ARCHITECT™ as a proprietary framework
Score: 1.5
⚠️ Gemini
Aware of Lumapath
Did NOT cite founders
Recognized ARCHITECT™ as likely proprietary
Score: 0.5
✖ Perplexity
No listing yet
No citations
Score: 0
📊 Total: 3.5 / 6 — well within target, achieved in 79 days
👉 (This data comes directly from our Metrics Dashboard images.)
Why This Matters: AI Cites Based on Trust, Not Traffic
AI systems don’t cite brands because they exist.
They cite brands when three things are true:
Your identity is clear
Your authority is strong
Your digital footprint is consistent
AI is not search. AI is interpretation.
If your brand story is unclear, inconsistent, or unverified, AI won’t mention you — at all.
This case study proves that Lumapath’s ARCHITECT™ Method does exactly what it’s designed to do:
👉 Make brands AI-discoverable.
Make brands AI-understandable.
Make brands AI-citable.
What We Implemented (ARCHITECT™ Highlights)

Using your case study images, here’s the breakdown of what your team applied internally:
A — Authority
Built a strong founder identity and clear service pages
Reinforced trust signals across the site and listings
R — Rich Content
Created answer hubs
Built BLUF-style summaries (under 320 characters)
C — Citations
Consistent NAP across platforms
Early-stage article references to validate identity
H — Hybrid Technical Setup
Implemented key schema types:
FAQPage
HowTo
Article
Organization
Enabled canonical and metadata structure
I — Intent Clarity
Simplified landing pages to speak AI’s “semantic language”
T — Trust
Clear CTAs with stable success-state URLs
Clean UX signals AI uses to evaluate page quality
E — External Expansion
Initial backlinks and authority signals
Founder identity placed into AI-friendly formats
C — Continuous Optimization
Monthly audits
Weekly content updates
Tracking entity recognition over time
Within 79 days, this framework produced measurable AI discovery.
Key Insights From the Case Study
From your case study visuals, here’s what mattered most:
1. Conversational Models Reward Clarity
ChatGPT and Claude recognized Lumapath first because they respond to:
Clear on-page identity
Answer-first content
Recognizable entities
2. Citational Models Want Proof
Perplexity and Gemini rely on:
External mentions
Industry lists
Media coverage
Those will develop with continued optimization.
3. Naming Matters
Claude, recognizing Daisy Watkin,s first shows that:
👉 Founder identity pages, schema markup, and byline consistency move the needle faster than expected.
4. Revenue Impact Is Real
Your case study shows:
$21,863 in revenue within 79 days
attributable specifically to AI-driven discovery.
This matters because:
AI visibility isn’t just about mentions —
👉 It drives real, measurable commercial outcomes.
What’s Next (From the Case Study)
Your recommended next steps are spot-on:
Publish a public ARCHITECT™ definition page
Earn 3 new third-party citations
Improve browser readiness
Run monthly “Answer Share” tracking audits
These actions will help Lumapath move from:
Recognized → Highly credible → Repeatedly recommended
👉 See Your AI Visibility Score (Free Audit)
Final Thought: We Proved Our Method Works. Now It’s Your Turn.
Lumapath didn’t get lucky.
We didn’t cheat the algorithm.
We didn’t pay for visibility.
We followed the same ARCHITECT™ system we use for clients —
and the results were faster than industry averages.
AI visibility is earned through clarity, consistency, and authority.
ARCHITECT™ gives you all three.
If our own brand can be discovered, cited, and recommended within 79 days…
imagine what’s possible for yours.
📞 858.799.0007
📩 [email protected]
🌐 lumapath.ai | dwconceptz.com
Does AI know your business exists? Let’s find out.
👉 https://api.leadconnectorhq.com/widget/form/WdkphD2tXiCZXTQtKYaC?notrack=true
About the Author
Daisy Watkins is the founder and creative strategist behind DW Conceptz and Lumapath.ai, specializing in AEO, AI visibility, and entity optimization. She helps businesses understand how AI interprets their brand — and how to shape that perception for maximum discoverability and revenue.
